A Hill of Beans
The world cannot have a truly global financial system
without the help of its accountants. They are letting investors down.
The biggest impediment to a global capital market is
not volatile exchange rates, nor timid investors. It is that firms from one
country are not allowed to sell their
shares in many others, including, crucially, in the United States. And the
reason for that is the inability of
different countries to settle on an international standard for
reporting. In order to change this, the International Accounting Standards Committee has been trying for
years to persuade as many companies as possible to adopt its standards, and
to convince securities regulators such
as America`s Securities and Exchange Commission to let such firms list on their
stock exchanges. But the IASC has so
far failed to produce standards that the SEC is willing to endorse. It should
produce them now. The purpose of
accounting standards is simple: to help investors keep track of what managers
are doing with their money. Countries
such as America and Britain, in which managers are accountable to lots of
dispersed investors, have had to develop
standards that are more transparent and rigorous than those of other
countries. And since the purpose of international standards is to encourage
such markets on a global scale, it makes sense to use these countries`
standards as a guide.
British and American accounting standards have their
respective flaws, debated ad nauseam by accountancy`s aficionados. But they are both superior to the IASC`s
existing standards in two main ways. First, they promote transparency by making
firms attach to their aggregate
financial tables (such as the profit-and-loss statement) a set of detailed
notes disclosing exactly how the main
items (such as inventories and pension liabilities) are calculated.
Second, they lay down rules on how to record certain transactions. In many cases, there is no intellectually ¬
right way to do this. The point is simply that there is a standard method, so
that managers cannot mislead investors
by choosing the method for themselves.
Let the Markets Do the
Talking
If the merits of Anglo-American accounting are so
obvious, why has the IASC not adopted its standards? Even in their present state, the international standards are more
rigorous than many domestic ones, and therefore unpopular with local firms. But
by introducing a rigorous set of
international standards, acceptable to the SEC, the committee could unleash
some interesting competition. Companies
which adopted the new standards would enjoy the huge advantage of being able to
sell their shares anywhere; those
opting for less disclosure would be punished by investors. It is amazing how
persuasive the financial markets can be.
Category: Corporate finance
|