The Statement of Cash Flows
The firm requires cash when it buys new plant and machinery or when it pays interest to the
bank and dividends to the shareholders. Therefore, the financial manager needs to keep track of the cash that is
coming in and going out.
We have seen that the firm`s cash flow can be quite
different from its net income. These differences can arise for at least two
reasons:
1. The income statement does not recognize capital
expenditures as expenses in the year that the capital goods are paid for.
Instead, it spreads those expenses over time in the form of an annual deduction
for depreciation.
2. The income statement uses the accrual method of
accounting, which means that revenues and expenses are recognized as they are
incurred rather than when the cash is
received or paid out.
The statement of cash flows shows the firm`s cash inflows and outflows from operations as well as
from its investments and financing
activities. Table A.3 is the cashflow statement for Pepsi. It contains
three sections. The first shows the cash flow from operations. This is the cash generated from Pepsi`s normal business
activities. Next comes the cash that Pepsi has invested in plant and equipment
or in the acquisition of new
businesses. The final section reports cash flows from financing activities such
as the sale of new debt or stocks. We will look at these sections in turn.
The first section, cash flow from operations, starts
with net income but adjusts that figure for those parts of the income statement
that do not involve cash coming in or
going out. Therefore, it adds back the allowance for depreciation because
depreciation is not a cash flow even though
it is treated as an expense in the income statement. Any additions to
current assets need to be subtracted from
net income, since these absorb cash but
do not show up in the income statement. Conversely, any additions to current
liabilities need to be added to net income
because these release cash.
For example, you can see that the increase of $303
million in accounts receivable is subtracted
from income, because this represents sales that Pepsi includes in its income statement even
though it has not yet received payment from its customers. On the other hand,
Pepsi increased accounts payable by
$253 million. The accountant deducted this figure as part of the cost of the
goods sold by Pepsi in 1998, even though Pepsi
had not yet paid for these goods. Thus the $253 million increase in
accounts payable must be added back to calculate the cash flow from operations.
We have pointed out that depreciation is not a cash
payment; it is simply the accountant`s allocation to the current year of the
original cost of the capital equipment.
However, cash does flow out the door when the firm
actually buys and pays for new capital equipment. Therefore, these capital
expenditures are set out in the second
section of the cash-flow statement. You can see that Pepsi spent $1,271 on new
capital equipment and $4,520 to purchase
new businesses. It also raised $772 million on other noncurrent assets.
Total cash used by investments was $5,019 million.
Finally, the third section of the cash-flow statement
shows the cash from financing activities. Pepsi raised $2,762 million by
issuing debt, but it used $1,815
million to buy back its stock and $757 million to pay dividends to its
stockholders.4
To summarize, the cash-flow statement tells us that
Pepsi generated $3,212 million from operations, it spent $5,019 million on new
investments, and it raised a net amount
of $190 million in new finance. Pepsi spent more cash than it earned and
raised. Therefore, its cash balance fell by
$1,617 million. To calculate this change in cash balance, we subtract
the uses of cash from the sources:
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Financial statement that shows the firm`s cash receipts and cash
payments over a period of time.
Category: Cash flows
|