THE WORKING CAPITAL TRADE-OFF
Of course the cash
conversion cycle is not cast in stone. To a large extent it is within
management`s control. Working capital can be managed. For example, accounts
receivable are affected by the terms of credit the firm offers to its
customers. You can cut the amount of money tied up in receivables by getting tough with customers who are slow in
paying their bills. (You may find, however, that in the future they take
their usiness elsewhere.) Similarly,
the firm can reduce its investment in inventories of raw materials. (Here the
risk is that it may one day run out of
inventories and production will grind to a halt.)
These considerations show
that investment in working capital has both costs and benefits. For example,
the cost of the firm`s investment in
receivables is the interest that could have been earned if customers had
paid their bills earlier. The firm also forgoes interest income when it holds idle cash balances rather than putting
the money to work in marketable securities. The cost of holding inventory
includes not only the opportunity cost
of capital but also storage and insurance costs and the risk of spoilage or
obsolescence. All of these carrying costs encourage firms to hold current assets to a minimum.
While carrying costs
discourage large investments in current assets, too low a level of current
assets makes it more likely that the firm will face shortage costs. For example, if the firm
runs out of inventory of raw materials, it may have to shut down production.
Similarly, a producer
holding a small finished goods inventory is more likely to be caught short,
unable to fill orders promptly. There are also
disadvantages to holding small “inventories” of cash. If the firm runs
out of cash, it may have to sell securities and incur unnecessary trading costs. The firm may also maintain too low a
level of accounts receivable. If the firm tries to minimize accounts receivable
by restricting credit sales, it may lose customers.
An important job of the financial manager is to strike
a balance between the costs and benefits of current assets, that is, to find
the level of current assets that
minimizes the sum of carrying costs and shortage costs.
In the Appendix we pointed out that in recent years
many managers have tried to make their staff more aware of the cost of the
capital that is used in the business.
So, when they review the performance of each part of their business, they
deduct the cost of the capital employed from its profits. This measure is known as residual income or economic value added (EVA), which is the term coined by the consulting firm Stern
Stewart. Firms that employ EVA to measure performance have often discovered
that they can make large savings on working capital. Herman Miller Corporation, the furniture
manufacturer, found that after it introduced EVA, employees became much more
conscious of the cash tied up in inventories. One sewing machine operator
commented:
We used to have these stacks of fabric sitting here on
the tables until we needed them . . . We were going to use the fabric anyway,
so who cares that we`re buying it and
stacking it up there? Now no one has excess fabric. They only have stuff we`re
working on today. And it`s changed the
way we connect with suppliers, and we`re having [them] deliver fabric
more often.2
The company also started to look at how rapidly
customers paid their bills. It found that, any time an item was missing from an
order, the customer would delay payment
until all the pieces had been delivered. When the company cleared up the
problem of missing items, it made its
customers happier and it collected the cash faster.3 We
will look more carefully at the costs and benefits of working capital later in
this material.
CARRYING COSTS
Costs of maintaining current assets, including
opportunity cost of capital.
SHORTAGE COSTS
Costs incurred from shortages in current assets
Category: Cash flows
|