NET PRESENT VALUE AND OTHER INVESTMENT CRITERIA
The investment decision, also known as capital budgeting, is central to the success of the company. We have
already seen that capital investments
sometimes absorb substantial amounts of cash; they also have very longterm
consequences. The assets you buy today may determine the business you are in many years hence.
For some investment projects substantial is an
understatement. Consider the following examples:
_ Construction
of the Channel Tunnel linking England and France cost about $15 billion from
1986 to 1994.
_ The
cost of bringing one new prescription drug to market was estimated to be at
least $300 million.
_ The
development cost of Ford s world car, the Mondeo, was about $6 billion. _ Production
and merchandising costs for three new Star Wars movies will amount to about $3 billion.
_ The
future development cost of a super-jumbo jet airliner, seating 600 to 800
passengers, has been estimated at over $10 billion.
_ TAPS,
The Alaska Pipeline System, which brings crude oil from Prudhoe Bay to Valdez
on the southern coast of Alaska, cost $9 billion.
Notice from these examples of big capital projects
that many projects require heavy investment in intangible assets. The costs of
drug development are almost all
research and testing, for example, and much of the development of Ford s Mondeo
went into design and testing. Any
expenditure made in the hope of generating more cash later can be called
a capital
investment project, regardless
of whether the cash outlay goes to
tangible or intangible assets.
A company s shareholders prefer to be rich rather than
poor. Therefore, they want the firm to invest in every project that is worth
more than it costs. The difference
between a project s value and its cost is termed the net present value. Companies can best help their shareholders by investing in projects with a positive net present value.
We start this material by showing how to calculate the
net present value of a simple investment project. We also examine other
criteria that companies sometimes
consider when evaluating investments, such as the project s payback period or
book rate of return. We will see that these
are little better than rules of thumb. Although there is a place for
rules of thumb in this world, an engineer needs something more accurate
when designing a 100-story building,
and a financial manager needs more than a rule of thumb when making a
substantial capital investment decision.
Instead of calculating a project s net present value,
companies sometimes compare the expected rate of return from investing in a
project with the return that
shareholders could earn on equivalent-risk investments in the capital market.
Companies accept only those projects that provide a higher return than shareholders could earn for themselves.
This rate of return rule generally gives the same
answers as the net present value rule but, as we shall see, it has some
pitfalls. We then turn to more complex issues such as project
interactions. These occur when a company is obliged to choose between two or more competing proposals; if it accepts one proposal, it cannot take the other. For
example, a company may need to choose between buying an expensive, durable
machine or a cheap and short-lived one.
We will show how the net present value criterion can be used to make such
choices.
Sometimes the firm may be forced to make choices
because it does not have enough money to take on every project that it would
like. We will explain how to maximize
shareholder wealth when capital is rationed. It turns out that the solution is
to pick the projects that have the highest net
present value per dollar invested. This measure is known as the profitability index. After studying this material you should be able to
_ Calculate
the net present value of an investment.
_ Calculate
the internal rate of return of a project and know what to look out for when
using the internal rate of return rule.
_ Explain
why the payback rule and book rate of return rule don t always make shareholders better off.
_ Use
the net present value rule to analyze three common problems that involve
competing projects: (a) when to postpone an investment expenditure, (b) how to choose between
projects with equal lives, and (c) when to replace equipment.
_ Calculate
the profitability index and use it to choose between projects when funds are
limited.
Category: Cash flows
|