Value of Information
Now that you know the project could be thrown badly off course by a poor
estimate of sales, you might like to see
whether it is possible to resolve some of this uncertainty. Perhaps your
worry is that the store will fail to attract
sufficient shoppers from neighboring towns. In that case, additional
survey data and more careful analysis of travel times may be worthwhile.
On the other hand, there is less value to gathering additional
information about fixed costs. Because the project is marginally profitable even under pessimistic assumptions about
fixed costs, you are unlikely to be in trouble if you have misestimated that variable.
Limits to Sensitivity Analysis. Your analysis of the forecasts for Finefodder`s new superstore is known
as a sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity analysis
expresses cash flows in terms of unknown variables and then calculates the consequences of misestimating those
variables. It forces the manager to identify the underlying factors,
indicates where additional information would
be most useful, and helps to expose confused or inappropriate forecasts.
Of course, there is no law stating which variables you should consider
in your sensitivity analysis. For example, you
may wish to look separately at labor costs and the costs of the goods
sold. Or, if you are concerned about a possible change in the corporate tax rate, you may wish to look at the
effect of such a change on the project`s NPV. One drawback to sensitivity analysis is that it gives somewhat
ambiguous results. For example, what exactly does optimistic or pessimistic mean?
One department may be interpreting the terms in a different way from another.
Ten years from now, after hundreds of projects, hindsight may show that one
department`s pessimistic limit was exceeded
twice as often as the other`s; but hindsight won`t help you now while
you`re making the investment decision.
Another problem with sensitivity analysis is that the underlying
variables are likely to be interrelated. For example, if sales exceed expectations, demand will
likely be stronger than you anticipated and your profit margins will be
wider. Or, if wages are higher than
your forecast, both variable costs and fixed costs are likely to be at the
upper end of your range.
Because of these connections, you cannot push one-at-a-time sensitivity
analysis too far. It is impossible to obtain
expected, optimistic, and pessimistic values for total project cash flows from
the information in Table 5.2. Still, it does
give a sense of which variables should be most closely monitored.
Category: Capital management
|